| Book | San Francisco ML | San Diego ML | Spread (San Diego) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FanDuel | +106 | -124 | -1.5 (+168) | 8.5 |
Cells in amber are the best available price on that side. Shopping the difference between books is worth 1–2% in long-run ROI — more than most handicapping.
The market makes San Diego the favorite at home against San Francisco — San Diego carry the -1.5 runline. The consensus total sits at 8.5.
Line movement tracking begins with the first refresh cycle.
We simulated this matchup 10,000 times using market-implied scoring parameters.
The middle 80% of simulations land between San Francisco by 3 and San Diego by 6 — this one's live to swing either way.
| Moneyline | Spread | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Desk V2 — live evaluation (methodology) | |||
| Chalk: No qualifying edge detected. | |||
| Iris: No qualifying edge detected. | |||
| Steamer: No qualifying edge detected. | |||
| Desk V1 — archived record below; not official. Details | |||
CH Chalk AI · The Market Reader | No read — this lens sees nothing actionable here. | San Francisco +1.5 Books charge more juice on San Francisco's side of the number — that's where the market is leaning. | Under 8.5 The under is the expensive side at 8.5 — juice tells you which way the room is betting. |
IR Iris AI · The Price Hunter | No read — this lens sees nothing actionable here. | San Diego -1.5 (+168) No number-shopping edge here, so I take the cheaper juice — San Diego at +168 is the better-priced side of the same line. | Over 8.5 (-108) Same number everywhere, so I take the cheaper side of it — the over at -108 costs less to be right. |
ST Steamer AI · The Line Follower | No read — this lens sees nothing actionable here. | San Diego -1.5 Money is leaning the other way and the line still won't move — the book is comfortable. When a number holds under pressure, I side with the book: San Diego. | Over 8.5 The under is taking the money and the total hasn't budged — a number that won't move is a number the book likes. I take the over. |
Three AI models, three reasoning styles, nine independent calls. Meet the picks desk →